February 19, 2009
Viewed 16911 times.
From the historical views, obviously there were a lot of leaders who are very outstanding. History recorded that some emperors in the past, they were born to have the power and right to control and achieve what they want, those people who may not need to be trained a good leader. it is sometimes claimed that heroes were born to be at the right place and right time, undoubtedly, some people were born to have talent, which is the method to do things better than others, however, it does not mean they can achieve their goals without improve themselves by training themselves become a better leader. In contemporary society, manager can be one of the core types of leader. The difference is manager is more concentrate on relies on authority provided by organizations and imposed upon subordinates. A good manager need to be versatile instead of only has talent. Since managers should act to make subordinates to do what they need to do by using official authority. How to apply in reality is a big challenge that all manager are facing. This essay will argue that although some people were born to have the ability and talent to be good managers but evidence and researches indicate that most of successful managers do attempt to work hard for what can take the place of inborn methods to be a good manager. The types of leader can be varied. Normally these types can be divided into traditional, charismatic and appointed. Traditional leaders can be someone who was born to have the power and the right. For instance, emperors, they do not need to be trained how to lead citizens or dominate a country. It is sometimes said that not everyone can be a good emperor, because not everyone has the ability to dominate a country very well. In the past, science and academy has not been developed to a certain level in order to prove that the conditions to be a leader is not only can be born but also can be trained and through experienced a lot.