Learn English with English, baby!

Join for FREE!

Social_nav_masthead_logged_in

My Blog

View all entries from My Blog >

my_high_IQ

my_high_IQ

Azerbaijan

June 6, 2011

       To love is to suffer. To avoid suffering one must not love. But then one suffers from not loving. Therefore to love is to suffer, not to love is to suffer. To suffer is to suffer. To be happy is to love. To be happy then is to suffer. But suffering makes one unhappy. Therefore, to be unhappy one must love, or love to suffer, or suffer from too much happiness. I hope you're getting this down.

More entries: unrealistic... (11), to love or not to love, that is the question (3), An Accent (4), fairy-tale (1), yummy.. (4), We No Speak Americano (3), 10 Things I Hate About You (5), Oracle or psychological game? (3), She is beautiful, just like you…. (5), persistent admirer (3)

View all entries from My Blog >

05:45 AM Jun 15 2011

my_high_IQ

my_high_IQ
Azerbaijan

ok guys so 2 voices are for LOVE, lets see what comes next ;))

06:17 AM Jun 08 2011

Agnolia

Agnolia
Russian Federation

definitely to love,    to love is to live

 when you love you are alive even if you suffer

 but when you don't love you are not alive therefore   you don't exist so you can be neither happy nor unhappy

to LOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

05:51 AM Jun 08 2011

Saladeen

Saladeen
Pakistan

So, in other words can we put : to breath or not to breath, is that the question?!

Only stones can be happy without love; without suffering

'Happiness' breathing with 'suffering' is inspire, if do not than surely expire ... ;))