In that scale I'm probably 6. There is only one reason why I can't be 7: there is no way to prove scientifically that a god does not exist, and that's due to the fact that theists and atheists talk about different things when arguing about god's existance. Atheism is not a religion. For me that gives this sort of scenario full of dilemmas: 1. Things that I believe can be proved scientifically. For example some galaxies or other objects in the outer space, cells and molecules – things you can't see with naked eye. If you can't prove something, you can't be 100 % sure about it. 2. If we think about god as some kind of a supernatural creature, it is something that cannot be proved scientifically, because science explores natural, not supernatural things. Supernatural things cannot be explored just because they're supernatural.
3. In science's eyes, supernatural things do not exist. (Yet, there's no way to prove it in a scientific way…) 4. Science cannot explore things that don't exist because there's nothing to explore. 5. There's no way science could prove a god does or doesn't exist. 6. Since science cannot prove that a god doesn't exist, I cannot be sure it doesn't exist: there's no proof about it. So, I don't see why there would be a god. I need a god as much as theists need The Flying Spaghetti Monster. For me it's just imagination, a thought in one's mind. But there's nothing wrong about imagination: it helps many people get through difficult things in life. But persecuting people because they don't believe in the same thought is just simply stupid and thoughtless.
|