i watched TIME and NY times some days ago. its really a tough time for people lived there. the foreclosure crisis lead to a plenty of mortgages that people cant be able to pay. banks collapsed due to its running out of cash and cant be get payed from lending loans. many of companies dont have enough cash to rebuild their businesses. seems we've seen the shadows of American Recession at 1929. i think the 700billions bailout plan is quite wise before the crisis hits the manufacturing industry completely. its pretty much the same situation when the financial crisis hited the manufacturing industry without any bailouts at 1929. Paulson got clear ideas about this. reportedlly, Paulson is gonna be replaced by other four leading candidates for the Treasury Secretary. wish the next one could do a better job. one thing is this bailout plan is based on the big shareholders and investors which means many of people will loose their jobs with no doubt. incenting their passion to invest sounds reasonable, but it cant be so effective without stablizing people's income, i think. some of economist said this big crisis was resulted from the highly-flow liquidity. well i dont think so. i think its due to the heavily invested cash or money had exacerbated the envrionment with the original weakness inside the free market, plus lack of some good supervision. well, from where i live. people who works at some American companies had been anonced they're gonna loose their jobs, too. i think China hasnt been affected by the crisis yet, but it will come here soon. i even cant imagine what will be happened when it land on China. just yersteday, the China central government was hard-pressed to say that they will intensify on reforming the corporation tax and add-value tax. another 400billions has been confirmed to reactive the market. but the exchage market keep standing on the low-profile, even sometimes slip into 0. sounds horrible. the policy seems like a combination of "bailout" and "workout". i cant be so sure. now, its not the time of 'competition", but a age of " co-operation".
|